The tech and Internet communities have mounted a campaign to prevent passage of the SOPA bill.
U.S. Representative Lamar Smith, (R-Texas) told Reuters Thursday that opposition to the controversial Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) has not deterred his determination to get the bill passed.
SOPA, widely opposed in the tech and Internet communities, faces a hearing in the House Jan. 18, when a group of security and tech experts will testify. Numerous large Internet sites and blogs plan a blackout the day of the hearings to increase awareness of the bill’s potential disruption of the Internet.
While intended to prevent rampant piracy and backed by the film and music industries, the bill is vaguely written. It is supposed to apply to foreign sites only, but its provisions, criticized by many, could allow copyright holders to have sites with alleged copyright violations blocked by ISPs, removed from search engines, or prevented from doing business via PayPal or other online payment services.
The bill has no protections against false accusations of copyright violation.
Boing Boing’s Cory Doctorow argues that the bill reflects ignorance on the part of lawmakers as to how the Internet actually works. — Allan Maurer
Business Insurance.org created this infographic on what the SOPA bill could do to business and innovation:
Growing by 2 percent in 2011, tech-related jobs are nearing their pre-recession levels, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. It’s end-of-year report based on surveys of U.S. households in 2011 shows that IT unemployment fell to 3.7 percent in 2011 from 5.3 percent in 2010.
In 2011 about 3.98 million people worked in 12 IT-related job categories, near the 4 million employed in tech before the recession in 2008.
The number of IT workers fell to 3.78 million, a low point, in 2009.
According to the survey, about 83,000 IT jobs were created in 2011.
A number of surveys of executives have shown that modest IT hiring is expected in 2012.
One thing marketers always have to take into account is where their consumers are and more of them moved to the sunbelt last year than to any other states.
Texas gained more people than any other state between April 1, 2010, and July 1, 2011 (529,000), followed by California(438,000), Florida (256,000), Georgia (128,000) and North Carolina (121,000), according to the latest U.S. Census Bureau estimates for states and Puerto Rico.
Combined, these five states accounted for slightly more than half the nation’s total population growth.
“These are the first set of Census Bureau population estimates to be published since the official 2010 Census state population counts were released a year ago,” said Census Bureau Director Robert Groves.
“Our nation is constantly changing and these estimates provide us with our first measure of how much each state has grown or declined in total population since Census Day 2010.”
The United States as a whole saw its population increase by 2.8 million over the 15-month period, to 311.6 million. Its growth of 0.92 percent between April 1, 2010, and July 1, 2011, was the lowest since the mid-1940s.
“The nation’s overall growth rate is now at its lowest point since before the baby boom,” Groves said.
California remained the most populous state, with a July 1, 2011, population of 37.7 million. Rounding out the top five states were Texas (25.7 million), New York (19.5 million), Florida (19.1 million) and Illinois (12.9 million).
DC led growth
Among states and equivalents, the District of Columbia experienced the fastest growth between April 1, 2010, and July 1, 2011, as its population climbed 2.7 percent. This marks the first time it led states and equivalents in growth since the early 1940s. D.C. ranked 35th in percent growth between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.
Following D.C. in terms of percent increase between April 1, 2010, and July 1, 2011, were Texas (2.1 percent), Utah (1.9 percent), Alaska (1.8 percent), Colorado (1.7 percent) and North Dakota (1.7 percent). North Dakota was 37th in percent growth between the 2000 and 2010 censuses.
The only three states to lose population between April 1, 2010, and July 1, 2011, were Rhode Island (1,300 or -0.12 percent),Michigan (7,400 or -0.08 percent) and Maine (200 or -0.01 percent).
Nevada, the nation’s fastest-growing state between 2000 and 2010, ranked only 27th in population growth between April 1, 2010, and July 1, 2011, increasing by 0.8 percent.
During 2012, the Census Bureau will release 2011 estimates of the total population of counties and incorporated places, as well as national, state and county population estimates by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin.
The Census Bureau develops state population estimates by measuring population change since the most recent census. These are the first set of population estimates to be based on the 2010 Census. The Census Bureau uses births, deaths, administrative records and survey data to develop estimates of population. For more detail regarding the methodology see
The U.S. International Trade Commission says Taiwan-based HTC’s Android phones violated two Apple patent claims in a ruling that goes into effect April 19.
While this is good news for Apple and its iPhone, it may not be so good for consumers. Of the half dozen smartphones we tested last year (all Android or Windows phones), we like HTC’s hardware the best.
The ITC decision says HTC infringed on Apple patent claims that deal with software to make phone numbers and addresses actionable links.
HTC has said it has created workarounds to the patent difficulties. But the decision will afffect the Droid Incredible, EVO 4G, Nexus One and other HTC phones running Android 1.6 to 2.2, says Gizmodo.
Lightsquared may run out of money
Virginia-based LightSquared, the wholesale wireless network firm, could run out of cash by Q2 2012, according to an analysis of its most recent financial statement by Reuters.
The company, backed by Philip Falcone’s $5 billion Harbinger Capital Partners hedge fund, had a $427 million loss the first nine months of 2011. The financial statement seen by Reuters notes that the company may not be able to “continue as a going concern,” if it cannot raise additional capital.
Lightsquared is wrestling with FCC concerns that its plans for high-speed 4G wireless broadband services interferes with the GPS spectrum. It has submitted a plan to the FCC to circumvent the problem.
AT&T gives up on T-Mobile merger
Just two weeks ago, an AT&T public relations person approached me with the firm’s position at the time that it was still working on its potential merger with T-Mobile despite dropping its bid with the FCC to focus on U.S. Department of Justice concerns. Yesterday, though, AT&T threw in the towel.
It will have to pay T-Mobile USA owner Deutsche Telekom the $4 billion fee it agreed to pay if the merger fell through, but says it will enter a mutually beneficial roaming agreement with the company.
In a statement, the company said:
“After a thorough review of options it has agreed with Deutsche Telekom AG to end its bid to acquire T-Mobile USA, which began in March of this year.
“The actions by the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice to block this transaction do not change the realities of the U.S. wireless industry. It is one of the most fiercely competitive industries in the world, with a mounting need for more spectrum that has not diminished and must be addressed immediately.
“The AT&T and T-Mobile USA combination would have offered an interim solution to this spectrum shortage. In the absence of such steps, customers will be harmed and needed investment will be stifled.”
AT&T chair and CEO Randall Stephenson said, ““To meet the needs of our customers, we will continue to invest. However, adding capacity to meet these needs will require policymakers to do two things.
“First, in the near term, they should allow the free markets to work so that additional spectrum is available to meet the immediate needs of the U.S. wireless industry, including expeditiously approving our acquisition of unused Qualcomm spectrum currently pending before the FCC. Second, policymakers should enact legislation to meet our nation’s longer-term spectrum needs.
NASA has selected 85 small business proposals to enter into negotiations for Phase II contract awards through the agency’s Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program.
The selected projects have a total value of approximately $63 million. NASA will award the contracts to 79 small high technology firms in 27 states.
These competitive awards-based programs encourage U.S. small businesses to engage in federal research, development and commercialization. The programs also enable businesses to explore technological potential, while providing the incentive to profit from new commercial products and services.
Small businesses the backbone of the economy
“Small businesses are not only crucial to NASA’s trailblazing achievements in space exploration; they are the backbone of the American economy,” said NASA Administrator Charles Bolden. “As the wheels of our economy continue to pick up speed, it is important to remember that small business is the engine that is getting us moving again.
According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, small firms have generated 65 percent of net new jobs over the past 17 years. And federal procurement for women-, minority- and veteran-owned small businesses are a big part of that equation.”
NASA’s SBIR programs address specific technology gaps in agency missions, while striving to complement other agency research investments. Program results have benefited many NASA efforts, including modern air traffic control systems, Earth-observing spacecraft, the International Space Station and the Mars rovers.
“Working with small businesses through Phase 2 SBIR awards, NASA helps mature novel technologies and concepts to demonstrate their applicability to NASA’s current and future space and aeronautics needs,” said Michael Gazarik, director of NASA’s Space Technology Program.
“This maturation process also provides NASA’s small business partners to more fully explore opportunities to transfer that technology to the marketplace, while creating new jobs and growing our economy.”
In addition to meeting NASA’s needs, the proposals also provide innovative research in areas that have other commercial applications.
Examples include:
– Development of design and fabrication techniques that will be used to create better UV detectors useful to NASA’s missions to monitor ozone, aerosols and air pollution, which also are essential in the semiconductor, food processing and healthcare industries, where bacterial sterilization is important.
– A new composite material manufacturing process which could decrease manufacturing costs for NASA’s future heavy lift launch vehicles, as well as military and commercial aircraft, wind blades and towers, civil and automotive infrastructure and marine vessels.
– New high-performance lubricants beneficial to robotic spacecraft operations in extreme temperature ranges that also may benefit automobile performance.
– A laser-ranging technology that can be used as the next generation air data system for aircraft that will measure velocity, wind speed, air pressure and temperature. This will help predict turbulence, ensuring a safer and more comfortable flight.
Three-phase SBIR program
The SBIR program is a highly competitive, three-phase award system. It provides qualified small businesses, including those owned by women and the disadvantaged, with opportunities to propose unique ideas that meet specific research and development needs of the federal government.
Phase 1 is a feasibility study to evaluate the scientific and technical merit of an idea. Awards are for as long as six months.
The selected Phase 2 projects will expand on the results of Phase 1 projects selected last year, with up to $750,000 to support research for up to two years. Phase 3 is for the commercialization of the results of Phase 2 and requires the use of private sector or non-SBIR federal funding.
Participants submitted 428 Phase 2 proposals. The criteria used to select the winning proposals included technical merit and innovation, Phase 1 performance and results, value to NASA, commercial potential and company capabilities.
NASA’s Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Calif., manages the SBIR program for the agency’s Space Technology Program. NASA’s 10 field centers manage individual projects.
Global events in 2011 demonstrated the impact that technology plays in driving social change movements. A new Walden University survey of 11 countries shows that most adults in countries around the world (89%, on average) agree that technology can turn a cause into a movement faster than anything else can. These views were particularly prevalent in Spain (93%), Canada(91%), Brazil (91%), Great Britain (91%) and China (91%).
The Social Change Impact Report: Global Survey was commissioned by Walden University and conducted online by Harris Interactive in September 2011. A continuation from the American survey released in the fall, the Global Survey includes the perspectives of more than 12,000 adults in Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Great Britain, India, Japan, Mexico, Spainand the United States and describes their perceptions on the importance of social change, the top issues in their country and the future of social change.
According to the global survey, in many countries, men are more likely than women to use mobile devices to text messages related to a positive social change issue, specifically in Mexico (23% vs. 16% of women), the United States (7% vs. 4%), France(7% vs. 1%), Japan (5% vs. 2%) and Germany (4% vs. 1%).
Young adults globally leverage social networking
The survey also reveals that when it comes to positive social change, young adults across the globe are leveraging social networking to get involved; an average of 29% of young adults[1] have used social networking sites in the past six months to engage in social change.
“Social technology has opened the door to global change, making information pass from person to person, regardless of location, at lightning speed. It’s never been easier to connect with others and take action.
.Individuals now have remarkable power,” said Andy Smith, author of The Dragonfly Effect. “But it’s those who harness digital technology and social media for pro-social ends who will create the greatest positive social change in the future.”
Additionally, social networking is more common than using blogs or texting to engage in social change among young adults in nearly all of the countries. Of the young adults who have used social networking in the past six months to engage in social change, the highest reported use is in Mexico (40%), India (39%) and Great Britain (37%). In China (50%) and Japan (12%), blogging is the top digital way of engaging in social change among young adults. Texting to engage in social change is particularly common in India (38% of 18–25-year-olds).
Technology is about to make it easier for the IRS to spot tax evaders and fraud.
The Internal Revenue Service will use SAS Analytics to help detect, prevent and resolve criminal and civil noncompliance with tax law. It has signed a $6.25 million contract with SAS to use its business analytics software to support the agency’s new electronic Return Review Program (RRP) system.
The RRP is designed to help reduce the $345 billion tax gap – the difference between what taxpayers owe and what they pay voluntarily and on time.
SAS can help by improving fraud detection and uncovering noncompliance at the time tax returns are initially filed, reducing the issuance of questionable refunds. Tax credit fraud ranges from child adoption or earned income tax credits to ghost tax-return preparers and identity theft.
“There is a significant opportunity to avoid improper refunds and payments of large sums of money,” said Karen Knowles, President of SAS Federal. “With SAS, the IRS can reduce the number and amount of fraudulent tax refunds, discover emerging fraud schemes and increase tax collections to shrink the tax gap.”
SAS scores tax returns through a hybrid approach of business rules, anomaly detection, predictive modeling and social network analysis. Users can easily set up business rules that detect possible fraud and immediately alert investigators or auditors to suspect returns. The software searches data for anomalies that could indicate fraud or error.
Predictive modeling uses historical behavioral information to identify suspicious behaviors similar to known fraud patterns. Social network analysis uncovers hidden relationships or linkages that suggest collusion and organized fraud rings.
Another weapon against fraud, SAS Text Miner scours unstructured data, such as call center data, to detect suspicious activity. Alerts and results are reported via a customizable dashboard. SAS’ case management capabilities help investigators prioritize and assign cases.
The $6.25 million contract will give the IRS Return Review Program access to many SAS technologies, including SAS Fraud Framework for Government, SAS Social Network Analysisand SAS’ industry-leading data integration, data mining and business intelligence technologies.
To analyze massive amounts of data, the IRS will have big data analytics capabilities through SAS In-Database functionality, SAS Scoring Accelerator for Greenplum and SAS Grid Manager.
SAS combines an array of technologies to tackle fraud, waste and improper payments in many areas of government – from detecting collusive patterns in entitlement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid to purchase-card fraud, bid-rigging and terrorist financing.
All 15 US federal departments and 80 national governments worldwide use SAS software’s analytic and predictive capabilities for critical initiatives such as performance management, budgeting, logistics, cyberdefense, combating fraud and improper payments, and threat assessment.
Global cyber security spending is expected to reach$60 billion in 2011 and is forecast to grow at 10 percent every year during the next three to five years.
The U.S. accounts for more than half of all deals globally, triggered by growing cyber threats and increasing awareness among both organizations and consumers of accelerating breaches and attacks, according to a new report from PwC titled, Cyber Security M&A: Decoding deals in the global Cyber Security industry.
Total deal activity since 2008 has exceeded $22 billion globally. In the first half of 2011, there were 37 deals accounting for over$10 billion in deal value, representing a 70 percent increase compared to full year 2010.
Since 2008, the total investment in global cyber security deals has exceeded $22 billion, an average of over $6 billion in each year.
Deal activity in cyber security expected to grow
“Deal activity in cyber security is expected to continue to grow given the fragmentation of the market and the attractive growth outlook,” said Barry Jaber, PwC’s security industry leader. “Technology and IT companies are making acquisitions to differentiate their offerings while defense firms continue to do deals to diversify away from shrinking defense budgets.”
“Against the backdrop of heightened awareness of hacks and deliberate attacks on institutions by semi-organized groups, the cyber security market is undergoing significant change and attracting investment from sectors that span technology, telecommunications, defense, professional services and financial investors,” said Rob Fisher, PwC’s U.S. technology leader for transaction services.
In most regions, the private sector accounts for the majority of cyber security spending, while the U.S. is the notable exception where government spending is almost equal to the private sector.
The strong U.S. technology industry combined with the fact that the U.S. defense and intelligence budgets are significantly larger than in any other country are key market drivers.
“The U.S. is a unique market with significant cyber security spending in the public sector, particularly by intelligence and defense agencies,” said PwC’s Jaber.
The U.S. market leads in value with the majority of deals (over 50 percent) involving acquirers or targets based in North America. By comparison, Europe accounted for approximately a quarter of deal value and a third of deal volume over the same period.
“Growing threats and awareness, and changes in technology such as mobile devices and cloud computing are key drivers of spending growth in the cyber security market,” added PwC’s Jaber.
Personally, we think it is past time for major corporations to spend serious money, time and thought on protecting digital assets, including customer information. If nothing else, the rash of high level cyber-security breaches this year seem to have heightened awareness that current security measures not sufficient to meet increasing threats.
Other key drivers underpinning growth in cyber security spending include:
Increasing cyber threats, both from new actors and new threat vectors (the paths that attacks can take).
Greater vulnerabilities due to the more pervasive use of technology, particularly mobile devices and cloud computing.
Increasing awareness by organizations and consumers of the threats and potential threats.
Changes in technology driving product and service innovation of security solutions.
Increasing regulation, particularly those enforcing the requirement to secure personal data.
Changes in outsourcing; some organizations are increasingly relying on partners for security, while others are growing internal security spending to maintain greater levels of control.
Corporate and enterprises continue to be plagued by issues surrounding safety and security of content. Against this backdrop, the importance of Digital Rights Management (DRM) software has been brought to the fore, given its role in ensuring protection of data against piracy, within and beyond their corporate networks.
With organizations preferring to digitize their sensitive and high value content to enable easy access and storage, fears over possible data leakages, theft, piracy and unauthorized use of digital information remain imminent.
The problem has led to considerable controversy in the tech community regarding both DRM software and government intervention such as the proposed Stop Online Piracy Act, which seems to create more problems than it solves.
But piracy and data losses not only cause huge revenue losses for the company but also tarnish the image of the company for ever. So DRM software is going to be a booming business.
Software and corporate information and the media and entertainment industry require efficient DRM solutions to protect their media and movie files against illegal distribution and sharing over the Internet and other illegal supply channels. Given the increasing levels of caution among content developers over safety of their high value content, the future definitely holds good for DRM applications.
Despite the popular perception that the dynamic environment of risk that companies and media houses operate in, and the ever-present data security threats, which interestingly tend to escalate during periods of economic downturn, make data security technologies recession proof, the global Digital Rights Management (DRM) market ironically in the year 2009 depicted a marked weakening in the midst of a steady deterioration in business climate.
Shifting focus to survival
The length, breath and duration of the economic slowdown has been unprecedented and the contraction in business activity widespread across diverse industries. The economic storm, in other words, wiped out numerous companies in software and enterprise segment and even pushed many large media houses on the verge of bankruptcy during the period.
With enterprise focus shifting towards survival, demand for content protection solutions, during this period, stood significantly weakened. Numerous corporate failures in emerging application markets such as banking and financial services, BPOs, and TV Home Entertainment, therefore squeezed opportunities in the DRM market.
Despite the 15.9% erosion in growth witnessed during the period 2007-2009, the DRM market made a smart recovery in the year 2010. This is largely because the underlying economics of content protection goes beyond the temporary weakness in the market’s climate.
Companies, especially software firms and large media houses, cannot afford to cut corners on DRM for long, given the disproportionately higher costs associated with data losses, piracy and unauthorized circulation of original content. These costs tend to far outweigh any gains stemming from cutting DRM expenditures as a measure to save money.
Niche markets will drive future growth
Additionally, a large percentage of the DRM market is built upon legally binding requirements. Observing the rules and regulations of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), vertical sections of business like manufacturing, financial services, energy and health care are paying more attention to updating DRM technology.
Future growth in the market will be primarily driven by emerging opportunities from niche segments such as educational services, healthcare, e-Books and financial sector will also drive future gains in the market over the next few years. Application of DRM for Electronic Medical Records, in particular will generate tremendous prospects for the market in healthcare market.
As stated by the new market research report on Digital Rights Management (DRM), the United States continues to remain the largest regional market for DRM. Asia-Pacific represents the fastest growing regional market for DRM waxing at a CAGR of about 19% over the analysis period.
Growth in the Asia-Pacific DRM market will be especially driven by continued demand for payTV services, which continues to boost demand for conditional access and pay-TV DRM in the region, particularly in emerging markets of China and India.
Media & entertainment fastest growing
Media & Entertainment DRM is the fastest growing market segment by end-use type, with revenue from the segment growing at a CAGR of about 15.3% over the analysis period.
Major players in the marketplace include Adobe Systems Incorporated, Apple Inc., CoreMedia AG, Digimarc Corporation, EMC Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation, IPR Systems Pty Ltd., Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., LockLizard Limited, Rovi Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corporation, RealNetworks, Inc., AuthenTec, Teletrax, VeriSign Inc., YANGAROO Inc., among others.
The research report titled “Digital Rights Management (DRM): A Global Strategic Business Report” announced by Global Industry Analysts, Inc., provides a comprehensive review of trends, issues, strategic industry activities, and profiles of major companies worldwide.
The report provides market estimates and projections for market segments – Software DRM, Enterprise DRM, and Media & Entertainment DRM across geographic markets such as the US, Canada, Japan, Europe Asia Pacific, Middle East and Latin America.
Gary Vaynerchuk keynotes the 2011 Internet Summit in Raleigh next week, which is nearly sold-out.
Fewer than 50 seats remain for next week’s Internet Summit, which is bringing hundreds of digital media and marketing thought-leaders to the Raleigh, NC Convention Center Nov. 15-16.
The event, which attracts a capacity crowd, offers take-away insight into social media marketing, search engine optimization, ecommerce trends, email marketing, we and mobile analytics, big data, cloud computing, startup fund-raising and much more.
You’ll have access to visionary thought leaders who will share their insight and experience with you. Hear from the founders of companies like Twitpic, TheLadders & HowStuffWorks! Not enough? How about a Keynote from Top rated SXSW keynote and ‘Social Media King’ Gary Vaynerchuk?
That’s just a sampling of the more than 120 speakers and presenters that will be on hand.
We interviewed just a handful of the many presenters. For a preview of what thought-leaders will be presenting at the event see:
John Lovett, Sr Partner, Web Analytics Demystified
Drew Diskin, Dir of Interactive & Web Strategy, Penn Medicine
Lynette Montgomery, VP Ecommerce, Burt’s Bees
Noah Dinkin, Co-Founder & President, FanBridge
Jessica Bowman, SEOinhouse.com
Todd Moy, Sr User Experience Designer, Viget Labs
Donna Bedford, Global SEO Lead, Lenovo
Francis Shepherd, Media Evangelist
Dallas Lawrence, Chief Digital Strategist, Burson-Marsteller
Karen Albritton, President, Capstrat
Thuy LeDihn, Senior Marketing Manager, .ORG
Adam Covati, Co-founder & CTO, Argyle Social
Kyle Scott Richardson, Social Media, NC National Guard
Cara Rousseau, Social Media Manager, Duke University
Loren Baker, VP of Marketing, Blueglass
Matthew Muñoz, Partner & Chief Design Officer, New Kind
Jill Whalen, CEO, HighRankings
Jason Caplain, General Partner, Southern Capitol Ventures
David Heaney, Senior Associate, TomorrowVentures
John Lawrence, Partner & CFO, Longworth Venture Partners
Brooks Raiford, CEO, NCTA
Roger Krakoff, Managing Partner, Cloud Capital Partners
Charles Nicholls, Chief Strategy Officer, SeeWhy
Jeff Campbell, VP & Co-Founder, Resolution Media
Gary Storr, Business Architect & Solutions, Nortel
Jeff Spivey, VP Board of Directors, ISACA
Doug Hanna, CEO, A Small Orange
Lisa, Braziel, Strategy Director, Ignite Social Media
William Blackmon, CEO, LinkMein
Chris Condayan, Public Outreach, Am Society for Microbiology
Kyle Scott Richardson, Dir of Social Media, NC National Guard
Jill Carlson, Marketing Manager, Argyle Social
John Lane, VP Strategy & Creative, Centerline Digital
Michael , Gowan, Associate Dir of Web Strategy, Duke Medicine
Dana Kirchman, SVP Head of Client Operations, Lumi Mobile
Internet Summit is an outstanding learning experience mixed with prime networking opportunities and entertaining keynotes.
There’s even 5 additional hours of intense session digging deep into Social Media, SEO & Search, User Experience & Design and Analytics when you add the pre-conference to your registration.
Mark Cuban has invested in a mobile gaming apps firm. See below.
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission has received commitments from most of the large U.S. cable compaies to provide low introductory broadband service to low income households that have not had it before.
The initiative will provide service at $9.99 a month, well below what most households pay for broadband access from cable firms now. Comcast started offering the deal to low income households this year – which it promised to do after acquiring NBCUniversal.
The initiative, aimed at low income households with a child enrolled in the national school lunch program that are not current or recent broadband subscribers, provides the $9.99 service for a two-year period.
Also through the initiative, a tech company is providing refurbished computers to low income households for $150 and Microsoft will offer software, while Morgan Stanley is helping develp a microcredit program to help families pay for the computers.
The initiative is slated to begin in the spring.
Amazon Kindle line available in retail stores
A Kindle Fire tablet computer
Amazon.com today announced that over 16,000 stores across the U.S. will be selling the new Kindle family starting November 15.
Customers will be able to visit any Best Buy, Target, Walmart, Staples, Sam’s Club, RadioShack, Office Depot, as well as several other retailers, to experience and purchase the $79 Kindle, the $99 Kindle Touch, the $149 Kindle 3G and the $199 Kindle Fire. The all-new $79 Kindle has been available in stores around the world since shortly after it was introduced.
H’mmm. Will retail availability boost Kindle sales? One of the speakers coming to the Internet Summit in Raleigh, NC, next week says 90 percent of shopping is still done within 50 miles of home at retail stores.
Mark Cuban invests in Mention Mobile
Hi-tech billionaire and entrepreneur Mark Cuban has invested $250,000 in Mention Mobile, creator of innovative social gaming apps,. Cuban, owner of the NBA champion Dallas Mavericks, will be given a minority equity stake in the company.
Specializing in apps infused with Facebook content, the investment will fund the development of Mention Mobile’s new single title apps that utilize the social networking site’s public information to customize games and create personalized content based off the user’s friends, preferences, interests, etc.
The Los Angeles-based Mention Mobile currently has two apps, Trivia Friends and Doodley, which have attracted over 150,000 users in less than three months. Cuban’s investment will fuel the creation of eight to ten new apps beginning with the release of Version 2 of Trivia Friendswhich is due out in the next week.
“Mention Mobile’s creativity, fun factor and advanced Facebook integrations skills are a great combination that I’m excited to be part of,” said Cuban.
President Obama famously refused to surrender his Blackberry smartphone when he took office. Now, many more voters are also armed with Internet connected mobile devices and social media such as Facebook and Twitter play a much larger role in daily communications.
So, as Obama runs for reelection in 2012, voters who are also social media users expect him to have a solid digital presence. In fact, says Jordan Bitterman, a senior VP at brand agency Digitas says, “JFK is considered the first television president. Next year’s victor may well be determined by the impact of Facebook and Twitter.”
A new study fielded by Digitas shows the importance of a strong social-media strategy for this cycle’s presidential hopefuls. Social media was certainly a contributor to President Obama’s success in 2008, and with its growth in popularity since then comes a growth in impact. This graphic puts some numbers to the trend.
The U.S. Government has inundated Google with requests for personal information on users connected to criminal investigations. The requests soared 29 percent over the last six months, Google reports in its “transparency report” disclosed this week.
Government agencies asked for information in 5,950 criminal investigations in the first half of 2011, up from 4,601 in the last six months of 2010.
Google complied in part or completely in 93 percent of the requests – which at times include subpoenas and court orders.
Dorothy Chou, a Google senior policy analyst wrote, ”For the first time, we’re not only disclosing the number of requests for user data, but we’re showing the number of users or accounts that are specified in those requests too. We also recently released the raw data behind the requests. Interested developers and researchers can now take this data and revisualize it in different ways, or mash it up with information from other organizations to test and draw up new hypotheses about government behaviors online.”
Google says it provides the transparency information in part to highlight the need to modernize laws such as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which was written 25 years ago – before most people even heard of email.
The National Retail Federation today asked the Commerce Department to delay implementation of a controversial plan to vastly expand Internet domain names, saying retailers and other businesses need more information before moving forward.
“The single comment we are hearing most often from retailers is that they wish they had more time,” NRF Senior Vice President and General Counsel Mallory Duncan said. “Whether they’re for it or against it, everybody agrees that there has been too much uncertainty around this process. Right now, uncertainty reigns.”
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, a non-profit that administers Internet names for the Commerce Department, plans to launch a program in January that would go beyond traditional three-character “top level” domain names such as “.com” and “.org” to include word-length domains such as “.retail” or “.shop” and also allow business names such as “.NationalRetailFederation” to be used.
Guidance is lacking
The plan has been under consideration since 2009, but “its scope and consequences have largely flown under the radar of most commercial businesses,” Duncan warned in a letter to Lawrence Strickling, head of the Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration. “To adequately plan, businesses need some level of clarity,” Duncan said. “To date, that guidance is lacking.”
Duncan said retailers have a wide range of brand identity issues and legal concerns to address before deciding whether to seek the new domain names. But ICANN has been unclear on information as basic as how many names will be available, citing numbers ranging 300 to 1,500.
In addition, the organization has told some businesses the new domains assigned in 2012 will be all that will be available for the foreseeable future, while telling others new rounds of assignments will be made every few years. Such details are important so businesses will know whether they need to move quickly or will be able to wait, Duncan said.
While some retailers believe the plan will offer new marketing opportunities, others are concerned that they could be forced to spend millions of dollars to protect themselves against “cyber-squatting” by registering multiple variations of their names to keep competitors, critics or unauthorized users from doing so.
Application fees for each of the new domains have been set by ICANN at $185,000, but NRF expects most companies to spend $250,000 per name when legal fees and consultants are included, plus another $50,000 to $100,000 a year to manage the domains thereafter. In some cases, assignment of a domain sought by more than one party would be decided by auction, further driving up costs.
While federal government departments are using social media, the effect may be muddled for citizens, according to a report from customer experience analytics firm ForeSee, the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Quarterly E-Government Satisfaction Index, including an analysis of the state of social media in the federal government.
ForeSee’s audit of social media activity in the federal government identified clear themes and best practices, showing that the public sector is learning to communicate with citizens in ways that are not usually associated with government services.
ForeSee conducted an expert usability review of the 15 executive department websites in order to gauge how many participate in social media and how they do it. All are participating in the three most popular social platforms—Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube—and many are using other new media and communications tools, from Flickr and podcasts to email newsletters and RSS feeds.
Social media now a necessity
“Social media is no longer a nice to have but a necessity in both the private sector and the public sector. It’s just the way people communicate now,” said Larry Freed, president and CEO of ForeSee and author of Managing Forward: How to Move from Measuring the Past to Managing the Future.
“The good news is that federal departments are participating in social media; the bad news is that efforts are happening at a variety of levels, and the effect can be muddled for citizens.”
Several clear themes and best practices emerging from the research are included in the report and can serve as useful guidance for other federal, state, and local governments.
When government agencies adhere to the best practices that make their sites easier for citizens to use, citizen satisfaction increases, as does transparency and trust. Studies show that when satisfaction increases, citizens are more likely to use the website as opposed to other, costlier channels.
Today’s report also includes the third quarter update of the ACSI E-Government Satisfaction Index, a report that has been issued every quarter since 2003. Overall, satisfaction with federal government websites remains at 75 on the ACSI’s 100-point scale.
Citizen satisfaction has remained at 75 or higher since late 2009 (with only one exception in the second quarter of 2010, when satisfaction fell briefly to 74.7). Today’s report represents more than 270,000 citizen surveys and includes scores for 100 federal government sites, all on a 100-point scale, so that comparisons can be made between sites over time.
Customer satisfaction a moving target
“Customer satisfaction is a moving target that requires continual adjustment to changing circumstances,” said Professor Claes Fornell of the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business and head of the ACSI. “Whether it is government or business, achieving high satisfaction requires responsiveness to consumer tastes, preferences, and even how they communicate, and part of that is effective use of social media.”
Today’s report also contains the ForeSee Online Transparency Index, which provides a consistent measure of online transparency and quantifies its impact on citizens’ attitudes and behaviors for 36 federal websites. In aggregate, transparency increases one point to 77, which is an all-time high for the category.
A full list of individual website scores along with more discussion of social media trends and best practices is included in the Q3 2011 ACSI E-Government Satisfaction Index, available as a free download at www.foresee.com.
Cyber war, long considered by many experts within the defence establishment to be a significant threat, if not an ongoing one, may never take place according to Dr Thomas Rid of King’s College London.
In a paper published in The Journal of Strategic Studies, Dr Thomas Rid, from the Department of War Studies, argues that cyber warfare has never taken place, nor is it currently doing so and it is unlikely to take place in the future.
Dr Rid said: ‘The threat intuitively makes sense: almost everybody has an iPhone, an email address and a Facebook account. We feel vulnerable to cyber attack every day. Cyberwar seems the logical next step.
‘Cyber warfare is of increasing concern to governments around the world, with many nations developing defensive – and reportedly offensive – capabilities.’
Recent events, such as a highly sophisticated computer worm known as Stuxnet, which was reported to have damaged the Iranian nuclear enrichment programme, have fuelled speculation that cyber warfare is imminent. There have also been alleged acts of cyber warfare originating from Russia aimed at Estonia and Georgia.
To war, action must be potentially lethal
However, Dr Rid states that to constitute cyber warfare an action must be a potentially lethal, instrumental and political act of force, conducted through the use of software. Yet no single cyber attack has ever been classed as such and no act alone has ever constituted an act of war.
Dr Rid concludes: ‘Politically motivated cyber attacks are simply a more sophisticated version of activities that have always occurred within warfare: sabotage, espionage and subversion.’
Dr Rid specialises in cyber security and conflict, irregular conflict and counterterrorism. He is currently researching how armies use social media and is working on a project on the subject of cyber security.
Personally, we think this is a war of words only. Cyber sabotage, espionage and subversion – some of it apparently sanctioned and funded by governments – is ongoing and increasing. Whatever we call it, now is the time to DO something about it. — Allan Maurer
Now, you don't have to be Superman to see through walls.
The ability to see through walls is no longer the stuff of science fiction, thanks to new radar technology developed at MIT’s Lincoln Laboratory.
Much as humans and other animals see via waves of visible light that bounce off objects and then strike our eyes’ retinas, radar “sees” by sending out radio waves that bounce off targets and return to the radar’s receivers.
But just as light can’t pass through solid objects in quantities large enough for the eye to detect, it’s hard to build radar that can penetrate walls well enough to show what’s happening behind.
Now, Lincoln Lab researchers have built a system that can see through walls from some distance away, giving an instantaneous picture of the activity on the other side.
The researchers’ device is an unassuming array of antenna arranged into two rows — eight receiving elements on top, 13 transmitting ones below — and some computing equipment, all mounted onto a movable cart. But it has powerful implications for military operations, especially “urban combat situations,” says Gregory Charvat, technical staff at Lincoln Lab and the leader of the project.
Waves through walls
Walls, by definition, are solid, and that’s certainly true of the four- and eight-inch-thick concrete walls on which the researchers tested their system.
At first, their radar functions as any other: Transmitters emit waves of a certain frequency in the direction of the target. But in this case, each time the waves hit the wall, the concrete blocks more than 99 percent of them from passing through.
And that’s only half the battle: Once the waves bounce off any targets, they must pass back through the wall to reach the radar’s receivers — and again, 99 percent don’t make it. By the time it hits the receivers, the signal is reduced to about 0.0025 percent of its original strength.
But according to Charvat, signal loss from the wall is not even the main challenge. “[Signal] amplifiers are cheap,” he says. What has been difficult for through-wall radar systems is achieving the speed, resolution and range necessary to be useful in real time. “If you’re in a high-risk combat situation, you don’t want one image every 20 minutes, and you don’t want to have to stand right next to a potentially dangerous building,” Charvat says.
The Lincoln Lab team’s system may be used at a range of up to 60 feet away from the wall. (Demos were done at 20 feet, which Charvat says is realistic for an urban combat situation.) And, it gives a real-time picture of movement behind the wall in the form of a video at the rate of 10.8 frames per second.
Filtering for frequencies
One consideration for through-wall radar, Charvat says, is what radio wavelength to use. Longer wavelengths are better able to pass through the wall and back, which makes for a stronger signal; however, they also require a correspondingly larger radar apparatus to resolve individual human targets. The researchers settled on S-band waves, which have about the same wavelength as wireless Internet — that is, fairly short. That means more signal loss — hence the need for amplifiers — but the actual radar device can be kept to about eight and a half feet long. “This, we believe, was a sweet spot because we think it would be mounted on a vehicle of some kind,” Charvat says.
In this video, Lincoln Laboratory researchers John Peabody and Gregory Charvat explain how their team’s system can see through walls.Video: Melanie Gonick
Real-time imaging capability
Even when the signal-strength problem is addressed with amplifiers, the wall — whether it’s concrete, adobe or any other solid substance — will always show up as the brightest spot by far. To get around this problem, the researchers use an analog crystal filter, which exploits frequency differences between the modulated waves bouncing off the wall and those coming from the target.
“So if the wall is 20 feet away, let’s say, it shows up as a 20-kilohertz sine wave. If you, behind the wall, are 30 feet away, maybe you’ll show up as a 30-kilohertz sine wave,” Charvat says. The filter can be set to allow only waves in the range of 30 kilohertz to pass through to the receivers, effectively deleting the wall from the image so that it doesn’t overpower the receiver.
“It’s a very capable system mainly because of its real-time imaging capability,” says Robert Burkholder, a research professor in Ohio State University’s Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering who was not involved with this work.
“It also gives very good resolution, due to digital processing and advanced algorithms for image processing. It’s a little bit large and bulky for someone to take out in the field,” he says, but agrees that mounting it on a truck would be appropriate and useful.
Monitoring movement
In a recent demonstration, Charvat and his colleagues, Lincoln Lab assistant staff John Peabody and former Lincoln Lab technical staff Tyler Ralston, showed how the radar was able to image two humans moving behind solid concrete and cinder-block walls, as well as a human swinging a metal pole in free space. The project won best paper at a recent conference, the 2010 Tri-Services Radar Symposium.
Because the processor uses a subtraction method — comparing each new picture to the last, and seeing what’s changed — the radar can only detect moving targets, not inanimate objects such as furniture. Still, even a human trying to stand still moves slightly, and the system can detect these small movements to display that human’s location.
The system digitizes the signals it receives into video. Currently, humans show up as “blobs” that move about the screen in a bird’s-eye-view perspective, as if the viewer were standing on the wall and looking down at the scene behind.
The researchers are currently working on algorithms that will automatically convert a blob into a clean symbol to make the system more end-user friendly. “To understand the blobs requires a lot of extra training,” Charvat says.
With further refinement, the radar could be used domestically by emergency-response teams and others, but the researchers say they developed the technology primarily with military applications in mind. Charvat says, “This is meant for the urban war fighter … those situations where it’s very stressful and it’d be great to know what’s behind that wall.”
On the heels of cyber attacks on major companies that filled the headlines this year, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has issued guidelines telling public companies to disclose cyber attacks that might lead to financial losses.
The guidelines also require companies to warn investors of potential cyber security risks.
The guidelines say appropriate disclosures may include:
Discussion of aspects of the registrant’s business or operations that give rise to material cybersecurity risks and the potential costs and consequences;
To the extent the registrant outsources functions that have material cybersecurity risks, description of those functions and how the registrant addresses those risks;
Description of cyber incidents experienced by the registrant that are individually, or in the aggregate, material, including a description of the costs and other consequences;
Risks related to cyber incidents that may remain undetected for an extended period; and
Description of relevant insurance coverage.
Companies may also need to disclose “known or threatened cyber incidents” to place any discussion of cyber security risks in context, the guidelines add.
By Doug Thompson, Director of Product Management, Interop Technologies
Hurricane Irene caused more than 50 deaths in 12 states when it struck in late August. Making landfall in North Carolina and wreaking havoc along the East Coast, the storm left an estimated $10 billion in damages. High winds, tornadoes, and flooding destroyed countless homes and businesses and left millions without power.
A new public safety system may soon give wireless customers across the country more time to take action when storms such as Irene occur and to respond to other emergency situations. Known as the Commercial Mobile Alert System (CMAS), the network delivers timely public safety alerts from government agencies to individual wireless devices. Wireless network operators are a crucial link in providing this essential communications service.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) are implementing CMAS to complement existing emergency alert systems. CMAS will provide three types of messages—1) Presidential, 2) Imminent Threat, and 3) America’s Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response (AMBER) alerts.
Presidential alerts, the highest priority messages, are issued by the U.S. President to identify local, regional, or national emergencies. Imminent Threat alerts provide notification of emergency conditions, such as hurricanes or tornadoes, where individuals should take immediate action. AMBER alerts are related to missing or endangered children in abduction or runaway situations.
How it works
When an emergency occurs, authorized national, state, or local government officials will send an alert to a Federal Alert Gateway, which will authenticate the alert and forward it to the Commercial Mobile Service Provider (CMSP) Gateway of each participating wireless operator. This network element will validate the alert and forward it to CMAS-enabled devices currently in the targeted geographic area.
Messages will be sent using cell broadcast technology, which enables delivery of alerts in seconds to wireless users based on their current location. Unlike one-to-one SMS technology, which can overload networks during periods of peak usage, cell broadcast’s one-to-many, geographically based messaging technology simultaneously reaches a large number of individuals in a targeted area.
Participating network operators must ensure that cell broadcast technology is enabled on their networks to participate in CMAS.
Operators are prohibited from charging subscribers for CMAS, yet it is viewed by most as an important customer care initiative with potential subscriber retention implications for those that do not comply. For example, operators choosing not to participate in CMAS must notify their customers that they cannot deliver the alerts, which may cause some subscribers to switch operators
Wireless network operators who choose to participate in the voluntary CMAS program must meet the FCC’s implementation deadline of April 2012, although leading U.S. operators have announced plans to offer CMAS alerts to their customers prior to that date. With Interop’s hosted solution, operators of all sizes can ensure that their subscribers begin to receive alerts at the same time as customers of the largest operators.
To receive crucial weather and public safety alerts in times of emergency, wireless customers in the Southeast should make sure that the wireless devices and networks they choose are CMAS-enabled.
Although in-network CMSP Gateways are available, a hosted CMSP Gateway from Interop Technologies in Fort Myers, FL, offers operators a fast, affordable way to provide these critical alert messages in times of crisis. A hosted solution eliminates the need for investment in new gateways or additional staff to maintain the system, minimizing associated OPEX and CAPEX. With the least impact on an operator’s network, a hosted CMSP Gateway also enables operators to comply with CMAS more rapidly than by deploying an in-network solution.
As Director of Product Management, Doug Thompson drives the evolution of Interop Technologies solutions as they continue to support next-generation technologies for wireless and broadband operators. Doug has more than 18 years of experience in telecommunications.
A new study gives Vivek Kundra a “B” grade for leadership and shows that Feds support his initiatives – but raises questions about OMB’s implementation timing, funding, and conflicting mandates., according to the “Over to You, Mr. VanRoekel… A Federal IT Referendum on Change Study,” which is based on a survey of Federal IT professionals at the MeriTalk Innovation Nation conference on August 23,
While the majority of Federal IT professionals (71 percent) believe Vivek Kundra made a significant impact while in office and credit his vision as his greatest strength, the study reveals that top challenges under Kundra included lack of funding to fulfill mandates (59 percent), conflicting mandates (44 percent), and unrealistic goals/mandates (41 percent). When asked to vote on the three most important priorities for the new Federal CIO, Steven VanRoekel, respondents say:
Reduce the number of mandates and deconflict (60 percent)
Reassess goals/timelines to make success attainable (53 percent)
Listen to feedback/counsel from IT operators (46 percent)
Cloud First a good idea, but adoption slow
According to the study, 92 percent of Feds believe cloud is a good idea for Federal IT, but just 29 percent are following the administration’s mandated “Cloud First” policy. And, almost half (42 percent), say they are adopting a “wait-and-see” approach related to cloud. Respondents cite numerous challenges including security issues (64 percent), cultural issues (36 percent), and budget constraints (36 percent), as barriers to cloud computing.
Almost all Feds (95 percent) also vote for data center consolidation, although the majority (70 percent) say Federal agencies will not be able to eliminate the mandated 800 data centers by 2015.
Respondents do anticipate realizing savings from their data center consolidation efforts, with most (74 percent) estimating the Federal government can save at least $75 million overall. Respondents acknowledge, however, that investment is needed – 85 percent say Feds will not realize data center savings without new investment.
When it comes to cyber security, respondents unanimously agree threats have increased in the last year (100 percent say yes). Feds say the most important priorities for cyber security going forward are: securing Federal networks (68 percent), critical infrastructure protection (56 percent), and privacy protection (36 percent).
Funding to meet priorties short
However, Feds say funding to meet these priorities is, on average, 41 percent short. Further, Feds are unclear who owns cyber security, highlighting a leadership vacuum.
“Vivek’s tenure at OMB was like a bottle of champagne – seems like a great idea, exciting start, but the plan’s unclear, and the next morning you wake up with the same problems and a sore head,” said Steve O’Keeffe, founder, MeriTalk. “We’re hoping that Mr. VanRoekel listens to Fed IT operators and provides a more sober, practical path – that will deliver tangible bottom-line improvements.”