TechJournal South Header

Posts Tagged ‘investing’

Consumers more secure financially, but not interested in stocks

Monday, April 22nd, 2013

Wall St. signDespite recent stock market highs, individual investors remain very risk-averse. More than three in four Americans (76%) say they are not more inclined to invest in the stock market with interest rates on savings accounts and CDs at record lows, according to new research from Bankrate.com (NYSE: RATE).

That is the same percentage Bankrate.com measured at this time last year. The percentage of people who are more inclined to invest in stocks increased slightly this year (to 22% from 18%), but that is a negligible change considering the poll’s 3.7% margin of error.

“Although the Fed is trying to push investors into riskier assets in pursuit of better returns, individual investors aren’t biting,” saidGreg McBride , CFA, Bankrate.com’s senior financial analyst.

Of course, this study doesn’t include those already heavily involved in the market. Personally, we’re more inclined to invest in stocks while it continues to rise.

Consumers feeling a little better

Bankrate.com also announced its latest Financial Security Index results. The Index dipped from 101.5 in March to 100.4 in April, but still indicates that consumers are feeling better about their financial security relative to 12 months ago (any figure above 100 illustrates improved financial security). This is only the fourth time in the 29 months since its inception that the Index has registered in positive territory.

“Even disappointing job growth in March wasn’t enough to shake Americans’ upbeat feelings of financial security relative to one year ago,” McBride added.

Americans feel less secure than last year in only one of the Financial Security Index’s five components: savings. Those who feel less comfortable with their current savings outnumber those who feel more comfortable by a ratio of greater than two to one.

They see progress in key areas

Consumers feel they have progressed over the past year in each of the other four components: job security, debt, net worth and overall financial situation. Sentiment regarding savings, debt, net worth and overall financial situation remains correlated with income.

Lower-income households possess the most downbeat levels of security while higher-income households are either the most likely to be upbeat or the least likely to be negative. Not surprisingly, lower-income households are also the least inclined to invest in the stock market due to low interest rates.

The survey was conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International (PSRAI) and can be seen in its entirety here:

http://www.bankrate.com/finance/consumer-index/financial-security-charts-0413.aspx

Grotech VC offers seven lessons on entrepreneurship “from the dark side”

Monday, February 18th, 2013

By Allan Maurer

Don Rainey

Don Rainey

Does price really matter in a venture financing deal? Can “small ideas” still get funded?

Don Rainey, a former entrepreneur, says his 12-years “on the dark side” as a venture capitalist, have taught him a handful of lessons that still serve him daily, among them, answers to those questions and others.

Rainey, a general partner with Grotech Ventures since 2007, was named to the Washingtonian’s “Tech Titans” list in 2011, and currently serves on the boards of Grotech portfolio companies Clarabridge, GramercyOne, HelloWallet, LivingSocial, Personal, SnappCloud, and Zenoss. He’s one of more than two-dozen venture capitalists and other investors participating in the upcoming Southeast Venture Conference in Charlotte, NC, March 13-14.

Price doesn’t matter

On his blog, VC in DC, Rainy outlined ten of the lessons about entrepreneurship that still guide him.

That business about price, for instance. “Price doesn’t really matter,” he says. “If you invest in something htat fails, it’s immaterial. If it wins, you might hope you had bought it a little cheaper, but you’ll always wish for that. The question is, is it something you believe in? If a deal works out, the price was right at some level. Get in good deals, and forget about getting the last dollar in a negotiation for that good deal.”

He adds, “We’re judged by whether the companies we invest in succeed, not the price.” Also, he notes, “Sometimes you do everything right and sill lose. Macro events can put real pressures on a company. Just think if you had gone into something aimed at financial services in 2007. Some things are beyond your control.”

Don’t pursue small ideas

Big ideas and small ideas are equally difficult, he says. But a venture capital firm has to have some multiple return on the capital it invests and can’t support small ideas, Rainey says. On his blog, he writes,  ”What’s the point in trying to change the neighborhood when you can change the world.”

You’re not a rock star

“I’m very suspect of the venture capitalist who wants to be in front of the parade,” Rainey says. “That’s the role of the entrepreneur. We’re enablers, not the primary actors.”

Add value outside of board meetings

Portfolio company board meetings are not the place where a VC adds real value to the firm’s investment. “Private conversations over coffee, lunch, or late at night is when you really can influence the CEO,” Rainey says.

Don’t Invest in People who don’t take advice

Some entrepreneurs have a world class talent for ignoring good advice, Rainey notes on his blog. “I’ve done this 12 years and only had one CEO who ignored my advice and failed. He made a point of it. It wasn’t personal, he ignored everyone’s good advice. A good CEO listens to everyone.”

Then, he’ll let you know he heard you, saying something like, “I concur on these four items from your suggestions. “That’s what the smart ones do,” Rainey says. “They assimilate all that advice and incorporate it into their own perspective.”

Never Panic

Starting and running a business is often fraught with extreme ups and downs, more than one entrepreneur has told us. One day you land a really big customer, the next everyone you talk to says “No.” An entrepreneur has to be able to ride that roller coaster. “One of the great assets of an entrepreneur is confidence,” Rainey says.

“It does ebb and flow. There are days when you’re driving to work thinking there is no way you could be more screwed than you are at that moment, but when you get to work, you find out you were wrong, there are ways it can be worse. It’s hard. People don’t always appreciate how challenging it can be to be able to swing above your weight in the face of weeks or months of bad news. But you have to keep on fighting, even with a strong headwind.”

Be nice to people, it pays well

“In a business like ours,” Rainey says, “You have to say ‘no’ to 99 of 100 people who come to you for money. If you’re not nice to people, even when you have to say ‘no,’ they remember. They also remember if you were nice about it. None of knows where we’ll be in five years or what we’ll be doing.”

 

Financing of U.S. solar projects on the brink of transformation

Thursday, May 24th, 2012
soloar cell photo

Solar cells are only one product Blue Nano materials improve

Financing of US solar projects is in the midst of a transformation, with new business models, new investors, and new financing vehicles gaining sway, according to new research by specialist research firm Bloomberg New Energy Finance commissioned by Reznick Group.

“However, investors still need to pay attention to tax and structuring issues as these are the factors that will often determine the viability of a project.”

US solar projects have historically been bankrolled by some combination of energy sector players, banks, and the federal government, but the landscape is rapidly changing.

Emphasis on third-party financing

New business models are emerging with an emphasis on third-party financing. New investors, including institutional players, are entering. And new financing vehicles such as project bonds and other securities are being assembled to tap the broader capital markets.

Bloomberg New Energy Finance, a provider of news, data, and analysis on clean energy, water, power, and the carbon markets, has worked with Reznick Group, a national accounting, tax, and business advisory firm, to describe this ongoing evolution of US solar financing: where the market is today, where it is heading, and what’s behind this important transition.

The resulting report, “Re-imagining US solar financing”, can be downloaded at http://www.reznickgroup.com/sites/reznickgroup.com/files/Re-imagining-US-Solar-Financing.pdf.

The evolution towards a broader investor base will help maintain growth for US solar deployment. Asset financing for US photovoltaic (PV) projects has grown by a compound annual growth rate of 58% since 2004 and surged to a record $21.1bn in 2011, fueled by the one-year extension of the Department of Treasury cash grant program.

Funding the next nine years of growth (2012-20) for US PV deployment will require about $6.9bn annually on average.

Two factors driving the evolution

Two factors will drive the evolution. First, traditional players are scaling back their participation. Constrained by regulatory requirements and by the continent’s financial crisis, Eurozone banks are offering loans of shorter duration and with slightly wider spreads.

In the US, a key Department of Energy loan guarantee program lapsed in 2011 making less low-priced capital available for large-scale projects.

Second, thanks to the continuing low-interest rate environment, non-traditional investors are becoming more interested, lured by the risk/return profiles of solar projects that employ well proven PV technology.

Motivated by attractive yields and the examples set by Chevron and Google, US corporations are eyeing forays into tax equity.

New models to broaden universe of solar investors

Pension funds and insurance companies are willing to give solar projects a serious look in the wake of the successful bond issuance for a solar project owned by a Warren Buffett-backed utility.

The past year has seen a crescendo of conversations around financing vehicles that draw on the capital markets, such as solar-backed securitization, master limited partnerships (MLPs), structures resembling real estate investment trusts (REITs) and publicly listed solar ownership funds.

In parallel, new business models for deployment of solar have flourished, including variations of third-party financing structures which enable customers to enjoy the benefit of local systems at little or no upfront cost. These models have the potential to broaden substantially the universe of solar investors.

“Solar equipment prices have dropped by more than half since the start of 2011 but financing costs matter too,” said Michel Di Capua, Head of Analysis, North America, at Bloomberg New Energy Finance in New York.

“New financing vehicles and new investors across the solar project lifecycle – development, construction, commissioning, and then long-term operation of assets – will cause the costs of equity, debt, and potentially even tax equity to migrate down.”

Policy could accelerate the transformation. Investors surveyed as part of this report seek stronger SREC programs, new standards, more flexible tax credits, and sanctioned high-liquidity investment vehicles such as solar REITs.

“A greater understanding of project risk and return is driving new investors into the solar PV market,” said Tim Kemper, Renewable Energy Practice Leader at Reznick Group. “However, investors still need to pay attention to tax and structuring issues as these are the factors that will often determine the viability of a project.”